rfc:shortsyntaxforfunctions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rfc:shortsyntaxforfunctions [2011/06/01 14:05] – [Request for Comments: How to write RFCs] tony2001 | rfc:shortsyntaxforfunctions [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
- | This RFC is a parody on shortsyntaxforarrays RFC. | + | This RFC is a parody on [[https:// |
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
In some cases it is necessary that you have to declare a lot of functions. Especially when you work with classes and their methods, the function declaration tends to make the code looking ugly. If you take a look at other languages (Brainfuck, Brainfork, Feckfeck, Smallfuck, Ook! and Spoon), they don't have such syntax at all! It's all short and readable and easy to type! Maybe PHP should adopt this behaviour to make code more readable and maintainable. | In some cases it is necessary that you have to declare a lot of functions. Especially when you work with classes and their methods, the function declaration tends to make the code looking ugly. If you take a look at other languages (Brainfuck, Brainfork, Feckfeck, Smallfuck, Ook! and Spoon), they don't have such syntax at all! It's all short and readable and easy to type! Maybe PHP should adopt this behaviour to make code more readable and maintainable. | ||
The purpose of RFCs are to work collaboratively towards a specification and finally an implementation of an idea. | The purpose of RFCs are to work collaboratively towards a specification and finally an implementation of an idea. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Syntax ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We might just replace the current **function < | ||
+ | I'd personally propose to use dashes and dots for everything of the above. It's short and you can read it really fast. | ||
+ | |||
Example code: | Example code: | ||
Line 32: | Line 38: | ||
. | . | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ===== Syntax ===== | ||
- | |||
- | We might just replace the current **function < | ||
- | I'd personally propose to use dashes and dots for everything of the above. It's short and you can read it really fast. | ||
- | |||
===== Proposal and Patch ===== | ===== Proposal and Patch ===== | ||
rfc/shortsyntaxforfunctions.1306937138.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)