rfc:saner-numeric-strings

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:saner-numeric-strings [2020/07/15 16:27] – Align comments theodorejbrfc:saner-numeric-strings [2020/07/16 13:18] – Enable voting girgias
Line 228: Line 228:
 ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== ===== Proposed Voting Choices =====
 Per the Voting RFC, there would be a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for the main proposal. A secondary Yes/No vote requiring a 50%+1 majority will decide whether float strings used as string offsets should continue to produce a warning (with different wording) instead of consistently becoming a TypeError. Per the Voting RFC, there would be a single Yes/No vote requiring a 2/3 majority for the main proposal. A secondary Yes/No vote requiring a 50%+1 majority will decide whether float strings used as string offsets should continue to produce a warning (with different wording) instead of consistently becoming a TypeError.
 +
 +Primary vote:
 +<doodle title="Accept Saner numeric string RFC proposal" auth="girgias" voteType="single" closed="false">
 +   * Yes
 +   * No
 +</doodle>
 +
 +Secondary vote:
 +<doodle title="Should valid float strings for string offsets remain a warning" auth="girgias" voteType="single" closed="false">
 +   * Yes
 +   * No
 +</doodle>
  
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
rfc/saner-numeric-strings.txt · Last modified: 2020/11/25 12:46 by girgias