rfc:rfc.third-party-editing
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rfc:rfc.third-party-editing [2016/05/13 01:41] – Make recommendation for how to summarize arguments. pollita | rfc:rfc.third-party-editing [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
If taken advantage of (and it would be optional to all parties), then not only does this provide a unified and consistent place to find established arguments during the voting phase, it ensures a historical record of the discussion in a more accessible format than searching mail archives. | If taken advantage of (and it would be optional to all parties), then not only does this provide a unified and consistent place to find established arguments during the voting phase, it ensures a historical record of the discussion in a more accessible format than searching mail archives. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that point 5 of https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Codify how summaries be presented into a rough format | ||
+ | * Update the default template to encourage RFC proponents to actually DO it. | ||
+ | * Grant implicit permission for parties other than the RFC author to make a class of edits to an RFC without explicit permission | ||
===== RFC Impact ===== | ===== RFC Impact ===== |
rfc/rfc.third-party-editing.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1