rfc:rfc.third-party-editing

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:rfc.third-party-editing [2016/05/13 01:41] – Make recommendation for how to summarize arguments. pollitarfc:rfc.third-party-editing [2016/05/13 01:47] – Clarify how this RFC related to point 5 of https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto pollita
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 If taken advantage of (and it would be optional to all parties), then not only does this provide a unified and consistent place to find established arguments during the voting phase, it ensures a historical record of the discussion in a more accessible format than searching mail archives. If taken advantage of (and it would be optional to all parties), then not only does this provide a unified and consistent place to find established arguments during the voting phase, it ensures a historical record of the discussion in a more accessible format than searching mail archives.
 +
 +Note that point 5 of https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto already calls for updating RFCs with arguments made on the list.  This proposal seeks to extend point 5:
 +
 +  * Codify how summaries be presented into a rough format
 +  * Update the default template to encourage RFC proponents to actually DO it.
 +  * Grant implicit permission for parties other than the RFC author to make a class of edits to an RFC without explicit permission
  
 ===== RFC Impact ===== ===== RFC Impact =====
rfc/rfc.third-party-editing.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1