rfc:reflectiontypeimprovements

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:reflectiontypeimprovements [2016/06/30 15:02] – Move to Voting levimrfc:reflectiontypeimprovements [2020/08/01 23:51] (current) – Status is "Declined" carusogabriel
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2016-06-10   * Date: 2016-06-10
   * Author: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>   * Author: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Declined
   * First Published at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ReflectionTypeImprovements   * First Published at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ReflectionTypeImprovements
  
Line 41: Line 41:
 It is unclear if voting requires 50%+1 or 2/3. On one hand this is not a language change but on the other this does contain a BC break. Rather than debating it one way or the other I've chosen to require 2/3. It is unclear if voting requires 50%+1 or 2/3. On one hand this is not a language change but on the other this does contain a BC break. Rather than debating it one way or the other I've chosen to require 2/3.
  
-The vote will be a simple yes or no for these changes.+The vote is a simple yes or no for these changes. Voting opened 2016-06-30 and will close 2016-07-08. 
 + 
 +<doodle title="Accept ReflectionType Improvements RFC?" auth="levim" voteType="single" closed="true"> 
 +   * Yes 
 +   * No 
 +</doodle>
  
 ===== Patches and Tests ===== ===== Patches and Tests =====
 The patch for this is not difficult; it will be coming soon. The patch for this is not difficult; it will be coming soon.
  
rfc/reflectiontypeimprovements.1467298962.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)