rfc:namespaceresolution

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:namespaceresolution [2008/10/31 17:49] – tweaked examples lsmithrfc:namespaceresolution [2008/10/31 17:51] lsmith
Line 20: Line 20:
 ?> ?>
 </code> </code>
- 
-==== Why do we need RFCs? ==== 
- 
 Obviously its important that we make a conscious decision for these questions. Depending on how we approach this, users might unintentionally trigger autoload, call functions in the global namespace they did not expect or they could run into trouble when trying to migrate existing code to namespaces. Obviously its important that we make a conscious decision for these questions. Depending on how we approach this, users might unintentionally trigger autoload, call functions in the global namespace they did not expect or they could run into trouble when trying to migrate existing code to namespaces.
  
Line 165: Line 162:
 - from 1.0 to 1.0.1: tweaked examples - from 1.0 to 1.0.1: tweaked examples
 - from 0.9 to 1.0: added some examples, added note about use statement, fixed some language issues - from 0.9 to 1.0: added some examples, added note about use statement, fixed some language issues
- 
rfc/namespaceresolution.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1