rfc:fiber
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rfc:fiber [2018/04/18 22:55] – lvht | rfc:fiber [2018/06/12 07:40] (current) – move back to discussion krakjoe | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
Both Ruby's Fiber and Lua's coroutine using the same **resume()** API to **init** and **resume** their coroutine. | Both Ruby's Fiber and Lua's coroutine using the same **resume()** API to **init** and **resume** their coroutine. | ||
- | |||
- | < | ||
- | |||
- | Introducing new keywords will cause BC impact. Both Ruby's Fiber and Lua's coroutine does not have such keyword as well. | ||
===== Unaffected PHP Functionality ===== | ===== Unaffected PHP Functionality ===== | ||
Line 137: | Line 133: | ||
===== Future Scope ===== | ===== Future Scope ===== | ||
- | This sections details areas where the feature might be improved in future, but that are not currently proposed in this RFC. | ||
- | ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== | + | Syntax like async/await can be implemented in the future, but it's out of the scope of this RFC. |
- | 2/3+1 voting majority | + | |
===== Patches and Tests ===== | ===== Patches and Tests ===== |
rfc/fiber.txt · Last modified: 2018/06/12 07:40 by krakjoe