rfc:empty_isset_exprs

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:empty_isset_exprs [2012/04/30 13:02] – Add paragraph for only empty() nikicrfc:empty_isset_exprs [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 2: Line 2:
   * Date: 2012-04-12   * Date: 2012-04-12
   * Author: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>   * Author: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>
-  * Status: In voting phase+  * Status: Implemented
   * Original discussion: http://markmail.org/thread/gnci76ugtwda2t42 (Apr 10, 2012 3:53 pm)   * Original discussion: http://markmail.org/thread/gnci76ugtwda2t42 (Apr 10, 2012 3:53 pm)
   * RFC announcement: http://markmail.org/thread/ju2jyrenxkeddrnt (Apr 12, 2012 2:42 pm)   * RFC announcement: http://markmail.org/thread/ju2jyrenxkeddrnt (Apr 12, 2012 2:42 pm)
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 <doodle  <doodle 
-title="Which of the language constructs should accept arbitrary arguments?" auth="nikic" voteType="single" closed="False">+title="Which of the language constructs should accept arbitrary arguments?" auth="nikic" voteType="single" closed="True">
    * Both empty() and isset()    * Both empty() and isset()
    * Only empty()    * Only empty()
Line 66: Line 66:
    * no    * no
 </doodle> </doodle>
 +
 +==== Result ====
 +
 +The RFC was accepted with the option "Only empty()". The relevant commit it https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/ec061a93c53c8cde10237741e98e992c1a05d148.
rfc/empty_isset_exprs.1335790956.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)