rfc:class-naming

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rfc:class-naming [2017/07/01 17:41] – Started Voting fleshgrinderrfc:class-naming [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2017-06-03   * Date: 2017-06-03
   * Author: Richard Fussenegger, php@fleshgrinder.com   * Author: Richard Fussenegger, php@fleshgrinder.com
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Accepted
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
  
Line 100: Line 100:
 Simple 50%+1 majority vote: Simple 50%+1 majority vote:
  
-<doodle title="Should we update the coding standard?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Should we update the coding standard?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
 </doodle> </doodle>
  
-<doodle title="What class naming style should we use?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="false">+\\ 
 + 
 +<doodle title="What class naming style should we use?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * PascalCase except Acronyms    * PascalCase except Acronyms
    * Always PascalCase    * Always PascalCase
rfc/class-naming.1498930916.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)