rfc:class-naming

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
rfc:class-naming [2017/07/01 17:41] – Started Voting fleshgrinderrfc:class-naming [2017/07/18 20:30] – nikic
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Date: 2017-06-03   * Date: 2017-06-03
   * Author: Richard Fussenegger, php@fleshgrinder.com   * Author: Richard Fussenegger, php@fleshgrinder.com
-  * Status: Voting+  * Status: Accepted
   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming   * First Published at: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
  
Line 100: Line 100:
 Simple 50%+1 majority vote: Simple 50%+1 majority vote:
  
-<doodle title="Should we update the coding standard?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="false">+<doodle title="Should we update the coding standard?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * Yes    * Yes
    * No    * No
 </doodle> </doodle>
  
-<doodle title="What class naming style should we use?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="false">+\\ 
 + 
 +<doodle title="What class naming style should we use?" auth="fleshgrinder" voteType="single" closed="true">
    * PascalCase except Acronyms    * PascalCase except Acronyms
    * Always PascalCase    * Always PascalCase
rfc/class-naming.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1

Page Tools