rfc:annotations
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| rfc:annotations [2011/05/10 03:19] – pierrick | rfc:annotations [2014/02/17 07:06] – The TYPO3-family as a whole uses it for dep-injection etc. meanwhile (CMS, Flow, Neos, ...) neufeind | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| * Date: 2010-08-24 | * Date: 2010-08-24 | ||
| * Author: Guilherme Blanco < | * Author: Guilherme Blanco < | ||
| - | * Status: | + | * Status: |
| * First Published at: http:// | * First Published at: http:// | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * **Doctrine** For Object-Relational mapping, examples: @Entity, @OneToOne, @Id, etc. | * **Doctrine** For Object-Relational mapping, examples: @Entity, @OneToOne, @Id, etc. | ||
| * **Zend Framework Server classes** Used to automate mappings for XML-RPC, SOAP, etc. | * **Zend Framework Server classes** Used to automate mappings for XML-RPC, SOAP, etc. | ||
| - | * **FLOW3** for dependency injection and validation | + | * **TYPO3** for dependency injection and validation |
| * **Symfony2** for routing rules | * **Symfony2** for routing rules | ||
| * **Others** One clear thing that comes to my mind is Validation, Functional Behavior injection (which could take advantage of [[rfc: | * **Others** One clear thing that comes to my mind is Validation, Functional Behavior injection (which could take advantage of [[rfc: | ||
rfc/annotations.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1