redefine_constants_exception_strawpoll
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Last revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| redefine_constants_exception_strawpoll [2022/01/23 03:08] – marandall | redefine_constants_exception_strawpoll [2022/01/23 03:12] – marandall | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Straw Poll: Redefine Constants Exception ====== | ||
| + | * Date: 2022-01-23 | ||
| + | * Author: Mark Randall, marandall@php.net | ||
| + | * Status: Strawpoll | ||
| + | |||
| There have been a discussions in the past about upgrading the attempted redeclaration of constants to be an exception. | There have been a discussions in the past about upgrading the attempted redeclaration of constants to be an exception. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
| Since this RFC was made in 2016, attempted redeclaration was promoted to a warning instead of a notice. | Since this RFC was made in 2016, attempted redeclaration was promoted to a warning instead of a notice. | ||
| - | As internals has been making efforts in recent years to move towards saner error handling this seems like a suitable candidate for tightening up, so I would like to collect opinions on how many people would be in favour of bumping this warning once more up to an Error (likely a ValueError) on the basis that attempting to redefine constant is always | + | As internals has been making efforts in recent years to move towards saner error handling this seems like a suitable candidate for tightening up, so I would like to collect opinions on how many people would be in favour of bumping this warning once more up to an exception |
| <doodle title=" | <doodle title=" | ||
redefine_constants_exception_strawpoll.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/23 03:31 by marandall