Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- pear:packages:spreadsheet_excel_writer [2009/08/03 13:41] – clockwerx
+++ pear:packages:spreadsheet_excel_writer [2009/08/03 13:47] – clockwerx
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ===== Alternatives =====
   * [[pear:packages:opendocument]]
+===== Who uses it? =====
+It's pretty darned widely used, because it's unique and mostly works.
+We see a fair number of relatively inexperienced developers who make use of it (rather than simple alternatives, like a CSV), and a smattering of more determined developers who contribute back fixes.
 ===== The original =====
@@ Line 11: / Line 16: @@
 The PEAR code is translated from a really old version of the original, about 12 releases have since taken place.
+There is no version control of the original, so it's hard to even see the small changes and just apply those.
+Not scared yet?
+   Hi John,
+   Is there a public CVS or SVN that Spreadsheet::WriteExcel lives in ?
+   Basically, PEAR has a port of Spreadsheet::WriteExcel, and it's not exactly been "keeping up with the joneses".
+   What would be pretty awesome would be a CVS or SVN changelog of sorts; or otherwise a list of bugs you've stomped.
+   http://search.cpan.org/src/JMCNAMARA/Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-2.21/Changes is all I've found so far - which gets me started, but...
+   On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
+        Hi John,
+        Is there a public CVS or SVN that Spreadsheet::WriteExcel lives in ?
+    Hi Daniel,
+    There isn't any public CVS or SVN archive. All of the previous versions are available here as tar balls:
+    http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/J/JM/JMCNAMARA/
+    Most of the PHP ports that I have seen are based on the Excel 5 version of Spreadsheet::WriteExcel, i.e. versions <= 1.01.
+    There was a significant change in the code base for the Excel 97 versions, i.e. >= 2.01, and there has been 13 not insignificant revisions since then.
+    In short, getting the PHP versions up to the Perl version is probably a non trivial task. :-)
+    - John.
-There is no version control of the original, so it's hard to even see the small changes and just apply those
 ===== How would we go about testing =====
@@ Line 20: / Line 44: @@
 The problem with this is the fragility involved.
+===== How do we tell if patches are any good? =====
+Well, this is a tricky one.
+The majority of the users are very enthusiastic, but there's not much in the way of testing you can do on the changes; nor does casual review really help.

Differences

Page Tools