pear:packages:payment_process
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
pear:packages:payment_process [2009/02/26 00:23] – clockwerx | pear:packages:payment_process [2017/09/22 13:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Payment_Process ====== | ====== Payment_Process ====== | ||
- | + | Payment_Process is a collection | |
- | ===== Payment_Process2 ===== | + | |
- | Developers: | + | |
- | doconnor, dbezborodow | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== PEPR proposal ==== | + | |
- | * < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ==== 0.1.0 ==== | + | |
- | * < | + | |
- | * < | + | |
- | * Unit test coverage (mocked out) for all drivers | + | |
- | * Running into problems here with many providers | + | |
- | * TrustCommerce seems helpful, speaking to support people, rpeake helping lots! | + | |
- | * Paypal - TBA | + | |
- | * Transfirst - TBA | + | |
- | * Linkpoint uses DTA((A popular german banking xml format)), so [[pear:: | + | |
- | * Bibit - TBA | + | |
- | * AuthorizeNet - TBA | + | |
- | * Lots of failures, errors and E_NOTICEs from existing | + | |
- | * Need to improve the test case loaders and what have you | + | |
- | * Dropping Paycom/ | + | |
- | * Support people won't give access to test environment | + | |
- | * doconnor has mailed other open source projects which provide paycom drivers to see if he can get test data | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ==== 0.2.0 ==== | + | |
- | * Add a new driver for an Australian Bank (Payment_Process2_ANZ) ((needs clearing)) | + | |
- | * < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== 0.3.0 ==== | + | |
- | * Swap to Exceptions as needed | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | See also [[pear: |
pear/packages/payment_process.1235607825.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 (external edit)