internals:review_comments
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
internals:review_comments [2013/10/14 13:38] – [Empty RINIT/RSHUTDOWN functions should be removed] ab | internals:review_comments [2013/10/14 13:47] – [PECL site conformity] ab | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
Also see the previous item. | Also see the previous item. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== PECL site conformity ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | A few conformity checks are done on the tarball upload, the PECL site will check for | ||
+ | |||
+ | . presence of LICENSE or COPYING in the package.xml, | ||
+ | | ||
+ | <file name=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | . for version string compliance in package.xml and the extension source code. The following should be defined in one of the extension header files | ||
+ | |||
+ | #define PHP_EXTNAME_VERSION " | ||
+ | |||
+ | This macros has to be used within your extname_module_entry to indicate the extension version. The version string in both package.xml and the defined macros have to match. The work of adding that macros could be already done when using ext_skel on PHP versions as of 5.4.21 or 5.5.5. |
internals/review_comments.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1