The ReflectionProperty::isPublic() method, by design, indicates only if a property has a “public” flag set on it, nothing more. Prior to PHP 8.1, that implicitly also meant “can be written to from scope outside the object.” However, PHP 8.1 introduced readonly properties, which broke that assumption with implicit private-set visibility. The addition of explicit asymmetric visibility in PHP 8.4 further undermined that assumption. The result is that there is currently no straightforward way to determine at runtime if reading from or writing to a property would be allowed. This RFC attempts to provide such a utility.
The ReflectionProperty object will be expanded with two additional methods, as defined below:
class ReflectionProperty { // ... All the existing functionality. public function isReadable(?string $scope, ?object $object = null): bool {} public function isWriteable(?string $scope, ?object $object = null): bool {} }
The behavior of the parameters is the same for both methods.
The $scope parameter specifies the scope from which we want to know if the operation is valid. Put another way, these methods can be read as “if I were to try to read/write this property from $scope, would that be allowed?”
The $scope parameter may have one of two values:
null. A null scope refers to the global scope. That is, “would it be allowed to read/write this property from global scope?” In practice, a stand-alone function is “global” for these purposes.
To use “my current scope,” the static::class construct is an easy way to specify “whatever class this code is running in.”
The $object parameter is an optional object to analyze the property on. If not provided, the analysis will look only at static information on the property, and thus ignore information such as if a readonly property has already been written to.
The magic methods __get and __set pose an interesting challenge, especially when combined with an unset property. For reading, the presence of a __get method means that any arbitrary property name might be readable, including those that are defined but explicitly unset() (a common trick in the past for lazy initialization before hooks were available). For writing, the presence of a __set method means that any arbitrary property name might be writeable, even if not defined.
Based on discussion on the Internals list, we have decided to take the following interpretation:
true.Both methods will examine the same information about a property, if available, to determine if the operation would be allowed.
isReadable()
unset()
isWritable()
set hookreadonly, is not yet initialized, or is reinitializable (__clone)Of note, this does not absolutely guarantee that a read/write will succeed. There's at least two exceptions:
One, some PHP built-in classes have effectively immutable properties but do not use readonly or private(set). Those would not be detected here, until and unless they are updated to use the now-available mechanisms. (See, eg: https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/15309)
Two, a get or set hook may throw an exception under arbitrarily complex circumstances. There is no way to evaluate that via reflection, so it's a gap that will necessarily always be there.
None.
PHP 8.5
Yes or no vote, 2/3 required to pass.
After the project is implemented, this section should contain
Links to external references, discussions or RFCs
* Allowing the “static” keyword for the $scope variable to indicate “current scope.”
$scope