Introduces a new function array_part() in ext/standard.
This RFC proposes a new array function that can extract multidimensional slices for arrays.
The function array_part() shall have the following signature:
array array_part(array $originalArray, array $partSpecification[, bool $indexesAreKeys = false])
The parameter $originalArray represents the original array from which a part is to be extracted.
The parameter $partSpecification is a sequentially indexed numeric array that specifies the slice to extract at each “level” of the original array. A level n (with n >= 0) of an array $arr is the set of array elements than can be fetched by “dereferencing” the array n times. For instance, the array [[1],[['a','b']]] has at level 0 itself, at level 1 the elements [1] and [['a','b']] and at level 2 the elements 1 and ['a','b']. $partSpecification[0] shall give the part specification for level 1, and, in, general, $partSpecification[m] for level m + 1.
Each part specification shall have one of the following forms:
null. step is a non-zero integer, defaulting to 1. If start or end are not specified, they default to null, which refer to either the first or last element depending on the sign of step. If step is +-1 and start and end are both null (or, if $indexesAreKeys is false, start and end are 0 and -1 or vice-versa depending on the sign of step), then we say the span encompasses all elements on that level (possibly 0).Span parts extract any number of elements (possibly 0) starting at the index specified by start and advancing until end is reached, advancing in steps of step. The element at the index specified at end is included.
An index i has the following meaning:
$indexesAreKeys is false and i is a non-negative integer (possibly after casting) then an element is at index i if it i is the the number of times one would have to call next() after calling reset() for current() to return that element.$indexesAreKeys is false and i is a negative integer, then an element is at index i if -i-1 is the number of times one would have to call prev() after calling end() for current() to return that element.$indexesAreKeys is true then an element is at i if its array key is i.The keys in the original array are not preserved in the output, expect at levels that were not visited. References are not preserved when the elements are added to the resulting array.
This function shall return false upon finding error conditions. The following are error conditions:
array_part([[1],[1,2]], [['start'=>0, 'end'=>-1], 1]) is an error condition, because while 1 is a valid index for [1,2], it is not so for [[1]]). However, span part specifications that comprise all elements are always accepted.[[]].The proposed implementation is available as git branch on github. I'll update the branch it as I improve it. This is not a prototype. If this proposal is accepted, this implementation will be merged.
A sample implementation, with tests exemplifying the use of this function, is available.
This implementation differs in some respects to the internal implementation with respect to behavior. Its purpose is only to exemplify the usage of the function here proposed.
I would find this far more useful if the keys were preserved, or at least an option to do so. Or the old standby that INT keys get renumbered but non-INT do not.
I want native array slicing through a new operator
That's fine, but it is not what this proposal is about. A change to the language presents many more complications which I very much want to avoid -- for instance the current array dereferencing syntax most likely would unusable because -1 represents the element with key -1, not the last element. Besides, the introduction of this function does not prevent native array slicing from being added in the future.
You seem to already have an implementation, why are you pushing this to us?
First, this function would benefit greatly from a native implementation. It's impossible to efficiently detect recursion in userland. The sample makes heavy use of references, which introduces a lot of separations. Traversing arrays without changing the internal pointer is very inefficient in userland.
Of course, the main reason is that this function is useful. Recently, functions like array_column(), array_first() and array_last() have been proposed. This function satisfies all those needs: array_part($arr, [['start'=>null], 'column'], true), array_part($arr, 0) and array_part($arr, -1).
The $indexesAreKeys = false mode is inefficient because there's no constant time access to the n-th element
This is true. We must traverse the array from the start or the end to get to the n-th element. That's just the way PHP arrays are implemented. However, if you have numeric sequential arrays, you can use $indexesAreKeys = true to access the n-th element without this penalty (also note that the sample implementation is not optimized).