rfc:voting
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rfc:voting [2017/09/22 13:28] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | rfc:voting [2019/04/22 06:53] (current) – krakjoe | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Request for Comments: Voting on PHP features ====== | ====== Request for Comments: Voting on PHP features ====== | ||
- | * Version: 1.0 | + | * Version: 1.2 |
- | * Date: 2011-06-05 | + | * Date: 2019-02-22 |
* Author: Zeev Suraski, Pierre Joye, David Soria Parra | * Author: Zeev Suraski, Pierre Joye, David Soria Parra | ||
* Status: Accepted, [[rfc: | * Status: Accepted, [[rfc: | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
===== Discussion period ===== | ===== Discussion period ===== | ||
- | There' | + | There' |
This does not preclude discussion on the merits on any idea or proposal on the list without formally submitting it as a proposal, but the discussion time is measured only since the formal discussion announcement as described above. | This does not preclude discussion on the merits on any idea or proposal on the list without formally submitting it as a proposal, but the discussion time is measured only since the formal discussion announcement as described above. | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
The vote is announced on the mailing list in a separate thread by sending an email with the subject **[VOTE]**. It should reference the RFCs being voted on and if there are different options discussed, explain these options. It should also contain the URL of the page where the vote is taking place. | The vote is announced on the mailing list in a separate thread by sending an email with the subject **[VOTE]**. It should reference the RFCs being voted on and if there are different options discussed, explain these options. It should also contain the URL of the page where the vote is taking place. | ||
- | The voting has minimal period of 1 week, which can be extended when circumstances warrant it. | + | Votes should be open for two weeks at minimum, at the authors discretion this may be extended, for example during holiday periods. |
+ | |||
+ | A valid voting period must be declared | ||
===== Required Majority ===== | ===== Required Majority ===== | ||
- | Given that changes to languages (as opposed to changes to apps or even frameworks) are for the most part irreversible | + | **Note:** This section has been amended by the [[rfc: |
+ | |||
+ | The primary vote of an RFC, determining overall acceptance | ||
+ | |||
+ | Additionally, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For procedural | ||
Line 43: | Line 51: | ||
In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: | In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: | ||
* 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR | * 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR | ||
- | * The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal. | + | * The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal. |
rfc/voting.1506086901.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/22 13:28 by 127.0.0.1